Misconceptions about “survival trapping”
Films, videos and survival books often suggest that you can easily feed yourself in the wild with a few traps. Reality is different: trapping without authorisation is prohibited in many countries, success is uncertain, energy gained and effort spent are often out of proportion, and improper traps cause animal suffering and endanger pets and people. In a real emergency, warmth, water, signalling and getting help are far more important.
- 10 minutes to read

Explained simply
In many films and videos it looks like this: someone is in the wild, quickly builds a trap, and the next morning there is dinner. In reality it almost never works that way. Animals are cautious, building traps takes a lot of knowledge and energy, and often you catch nothing at all. In many countries it is also prohibited without a permit.
Traps can also do terrible harm. They do not distinguish who steps into them: it could be a dog, a cat, a protected animal or even a child. And an animal that does not die instantly often suffers for a long time.
If you are in a real emergency, food is almost never the most important thing. Warmth, water and getting help matter far more. A person can last several weeks without food, but cold can become dangerous within hours. So call the emergency number early (112 in the EU), stay in a safe place and make yourself noticed.
How it works: effort versus yield
Every food source in nature has to “pay off”: it must provide more energy than you spend on it. For traps this means: you need detailed knowledge of the terrain and animal behaviour, materials, time and a lot of movement for building and checking. On the other side is an uncertain yield. Even experienced, licensed trappers are not successful every day – anyone who does not know an area depends even more on luck.
Then there is what small wild animals actually provide. Their meat is very lean: lots of protein but hardly any fat and practically no carbohydrates. The body, however, covers its energy needs mainly from fat and carbohydrates. People who had to live almost only on lean meat for a long time became ill – this condition became known as “rabbit starvation”.
On balance, in an emergency, trapping often uses up more strength, warmth and time than you get back. That strength is then missing for what really helps: a sheltered spot, water and signals.
Good to know: the most common myths
Myth “In an emergency anything goes”: exceptions for emergencies are narrow and differ from country to country. Anyone who sets traps in a short emergency risks penalties and causes harm – and almost always has better options. People who get lost or stuck are found much sooner if someone knows their trip plan and they stay in one place.
Myth “Meat solves the food problem”: as described above, lean game does not cover energy needs. For an emergency of a few days, hunger is unpleasant but usually not the most pressing problem for a healthy adult. Cooling down, overheating, lack of water and injuries are more dangerous.
Myth “Home-made traps don't harm anyone else”: a trap is triggered by the animal itself and cannot tell who is coming. Pets, protected species and children can be affected. Forgotten or lost traps remain dangerous for a long time, even when the person who built them is long gone.
When it makes sense – and when not
Trapping belongs in the hands of people with the necessary authorisation, training and equipment – where the law provides for it, for example in wildlife management. There, rules apply to permitted trap types, species, seasons and checking obligations. For hikers, campers or people in an emergency it is not a sensible option.
What always makes sense, by contrast, is understanding the topic. Anyone who knows why traps are regulated can judge survival media critically, give children honest answers and recognise when a video shows nonsense or even breaks the law. Anyone interested in animals will find far more rewarding paths in tracking, observation and citizen-science projects.
Safety: what really helps in an emergency
The well-known priorities of emergency preparedness follow from how long the body can manage without something. As a rough rule of thumb: in severe cold or heat things can become critical within hours, without water within a few days, without food only after weeks. That is why protection from weather and temperature comes first, then water, and food only much later.
In practice this means: call for help as early as possible via the local emergency number (112 in the EU). Stay in a safe place rather than walking on aimlessly. Protect yourself from wind, wet and cold from the ground. Make yourself noticeable with light, colour or sound.
The best preparation starts before the trip: enough food and water, warm clothing, a torch, a charged phone and a trip plan left with someone you trust. With these things you never end up in a situation where you need to think about traps.
Step by step
Myth: “Traps are an easy food source”
Even experienced, licensed trappers do not catch something every day. Without detailed knowledge of the area and animal behaviour, success is a matter of luck – and the energy spent on building and checking is real.
- 1
Myth: “Traps are an easy food source”
Even experienced, licensed trappers do not catch something every day. Without detailed knowledge of the area and animal behaviour, success is a matter of luck – and the energy spent on building and checking is real.
- 2
Myth: “In an emergency anything goes”
Emergency exceptions are narrow and differ from country to country. Anyone who sets traps in a short emergency risks penalties and causes harm – and usually has better options, namely getting help.
- 3
Myth: “Meat solves the food problem”
Very lean game alone does not cover energy needs. Living almost exclusively on lean meat for a longer period can make you ill (known as “rabbit starvation”).
- 4
Myth: “Home-made traps don't affect anyone else”
Traps do not distinguish between species: protected animals, dogs, cats and even children can be affected. Forgotten traps remain dangerous.
- 5
What really helps
Supplies and emergency planning before the trip, warm clothing, water, signalling devices, leaving a trip plan with someone you trust – and calling for help early in an emergency.
Common mistakes
- Treating survival videos as instructions
- Prioritising food over warmth and water
- Underestimating legal consequences
Quick view
Suitable for
- Realistic emergency preparedness
- Media literacy about survival content
- Discussion in groups and schools
Not suitable for
- Justification for illegal trapping
Safety
- In an emergency, first organise protection from cold or heat, water and help: call the local emergency number (112 in the EU), stay put, signal. Food is not the most pressing problem in most emergencies lasting a few days.
How it works
Anyone who sees traps as a food source must weigh effort against yield: knowledge of animal behaviour, time, materials and energy on one side – an uncertain, often small yield on the other. Small wild animals are also very lean; they provide hardly any fat or carbohydrates. Then there are law and animal welfare: a trap that is not checked regularly, catches the wrong animals or does not kill instantly causes suffering – which is why trapping is regulated almost everywhere.
Advantages
- Realistic priorities in emergencies
- Protects against legal problems
- Avoids animal suffering
Disadvantages
- Contradicts popular media images
Deep knowledge
Background
Humans can survive several weeks without food, but only a few days without water and possibly only hours in severe cold or heat. This leads to the well-known priorities of emergency preparedness.
The term “rabbit starvation” describes deficiency states on a diet consisting almost entirely of lean meat; it comes from accounts of people who had to live this way in cold regions.
Common mistakes
- Treating survival videos as instructions
- Prioritising food over warmth and water
- Underestimating legal consequences
Limits and risks
- No trap instructions
- No dietary advice
Sources
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2004): Human energy requirements – Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation
Human energy requirements
Council of the European Communities (1992): Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (Habitats Directive)
Prohibition of non-selective means of capture and killing for protected species